Feedback targeted visible morphology without reading the information gate; the bodies separated first, then began to converge, while a difference in causal responsiveness appeared later.
Question
Can body-only control write a later information-state difference even when the visible morphologies no longer remain far apart?
Result
In the open starting state, a clear gate-score difference appeared after 128 untouched steps and was essentially uncorrelated with the organism-level morphology split.
Next question
Does that returned information state change how the next body responds to a fresh intervention?
Two control histories reached nearly the same visible body at handoff, then separated again during untouched continuation. Their similar appearance concealed a difference in where each body would go next.
Question
When two developmental histories converge in appearance, have they reached the same causal state?
Result
No; their later trajectories rebounded apart without another intervention, and fresh identical actions preserved rather than created that hidden split.
Next question
Which dynamic coordinate can distinguish these same-looking states before their visible futures turn apart?
Equal-sized inverse spatial pulses were applied at the same developmental instant, and their opposite directions remained legible in the next seven passages of the future action map.
Question
Can a brief intervention be converted into a persistent, direction-specific causal history?
Result
Yes; matched physical displacement wrote opposite information-geometric memories, while the same ancestral pulse changed meaning when delayed beyond the commitment boundary.
Next question
Can feedback exploit that memory to keep multiple causal histories open after the controller stops?
The same counts of high- and low-directed pulses were delivered in alternating or blocked order, after which the later future clouds moved apart while retaining nearly the same volume.
Question
Does temporal order become part of the causal state when total intervention counts, beginning, and ending are matched?
Result
Every ancestor retained the order split after release and under identical challenge seeds, with memory appearing mainly in future position rather than breadth.
Next question
What lower-dimensional coordinate records this order, and how does it interact with the information score?
Excursion and hold paths were brought back to nearly the same information-score neighborhood, then released, and their states and future clouds continued to move farther apart.
Question
If two histories return to the same scalar score, have they returned to the same organism?
Result
They have not; the route remained encoded in body, dynamics, and future position, so the scalar compressed multiple history-dependent causal states onto one level.
Next question
Can the folded geometry of those score levels be mapped directly across both history and score direction?
Across 128 matched sheets, states at nearly the same information-score level remained separated by history as strongly as states spanning much of the reachable score range, and that history changed what later actions meant.
Question
Is the information score a complete coordinate for the organism's causal state, or does one score level contain distinct history-dependent sheets?
Result
The landscape is folded: history is a large state coordinate, the low-to-high direction depends on the sheet, and later future clouds move without a simple change in volume.
Next question
Which distributed response measurements can distinguish those history-dependent states more completely?
Two four-pulse histories had the same zero net hidden-state dose but opposite order, and the early body followed the first pulse block rather than the last intervention.
Question
When total dose cancels exactly, does the order of hidden causes still direct development?
Result
It does; opposite orders produced different body futures, which rules out both simple dose integration and a last-pulse explanation for the observed direction.
Next question
Over which developmental ages does the body continue to understand this order as the same instruction?
A full prime-and-test dose matrix subtracted each dose alone and the untreated future, revealing that opposite dose orders left different nonlinear residues in the body's surface and dense core.
Question
Does the first dose change how a mature body decodes the second, even when total absolute dose is matched?
Result
Yes; one order reached inward while the other remained nearer the surface, and connectivity retained a more specific memory than overall size.
Next question
How does that depth-specific memory change as the unforced gap between prime and test grows?
The depth-specific order trace was absent at zero gap, formed after sixteen steps, changed layer and sign at later gaps, and returned strongly after 128 steps.
Question
Does the effect of the first intervention simply decay, or does the body pass through a sequence of different response states?
Result
The trace behaved as a delayed, recurrent process rather than a fading scar, with different gaps exposing inward and surface-biased responses.
Next question
Can continuous measurement locate the state transition that launches each later response without relying on a fixed elapsed time?
A zero-net, information-directed prime launched a delayed response that changed sign, moved between surface and dense core, and reappeared more than one hundred steps later without another intervention.
Question
What spatial process produces the non-monotonic memory seen across prime-to-test gaps?
Result
The response behaves like a traveling reorganization between the body's surface and core. Component spacing follows the later response curve even when pixel differences remain subtle.
Next question
Can the next intervention be triggered by the body's current internal organization rather than by elapsed time?
Three equal-size forward and backward dose pairs tested whether an early information-directed push changed how strongly a later founder mixture remembered which founder acted first.
Question
Is the information-defined direction merely a sign, or does increasing its dose strengthen causal memory?
Result
Identity memory rose with dose along the forward direction and weakened along the backward direction, with spatial and founder-composition memory moving together.
Next question
Will the dose-dependent memory survive release and generalize to a fresh cohort with independently selected directions?
